What is the correct treatment for a signal aspect with a dark lower light?

Prepare for the Canadian National Railroad Exam. Study with flashcards and multiple choice questions, each one offering hints and explanations. Ace your exam!

Multiple Choice

What is the correct treatment for a signal aspect with a dark lower light?

Explanation:
When a signal has two lamps and the lower lamp is dark, there is no clearance being shown by that lower position. In Canadian practice, a dark lower light on a two-lamp signal is treated as a stop indication, regardless of what the upper lamp might be showing. That’s why red is the correct treatment here: the absence of a valid lower-lamp indication means you must not proceed and should stop, until a proper lower-lamp color is illuminated or another authorized indication is given. Green or yellow would only apply if the lower lamp were lit in those colors as part of a valid proceed or caution signal, which is not the case when the lower light is dark. Not applicable isn’t appropriate because a defined rule exists for this situation, and it requires stopping.

When a signal has two lamps and the lower lamp is dark, there is no clearance being shown by that lower position. In Canadian practice, a dark lower light on a two-lamp signal is treated as a stop indication, regardless of what the upper lamp might be showing. That’s why red is the correct treatment here: the absence of a valid lower-lamp indication means you must not proceed and should stop, until a proper lower-lamp color is illuminated or another authorized indication is given. Green or yellow would only apply if the lower lamp were lit in those colors as part of a valid proceed or caution signal, which is not the case when the lower light is dark. Not applicable isn’t appropriate because a defined rule exists for this situation, and it requires stopping.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy